A Smart Business Decision Maker = A Successful Entrepreneur

Many successful business leaders all share a common skill that most people do not posses. Although this skill comes in all forms and is dependent on the amount of opportunities given to them, they all still have to undergo a process whether it takes a long time to process or a very short amount of time. That skill, my fellow entrepreneurs is: Smart Business Decision-making. Every day people from all over the world make decisions. You may not realize it but you, the reader, just made the decision to read this article (Thanks by the way!). However, let’s take it to a business perspective; business leaders, (including yourself) “make dozen of decisions a day” that creates an impact to the success of their company while creating an influence factor to employees as well. “Developing such a skill requires a combination of education, experience, and intuition.”

Marci Martin, author of Business News Daily who wrote the article “How to Make Effective Business Decisions” has stated a great quote: “There are many things that influence how an individual makes decisions. They include emotions, perceived personal and professional risks and rewards, preparation through experience or education, deadlines, stress and a host of others. It is important to mitigate the irrational and embrace the rational.”

Many decisions always comes with a process, as mentioned above, there are many factors that come into play before coming up with a conclusion. Some of those decisions usually come from a “gut feeling” while others come from undergoing a long process of asking others, and a more common form would be the opportunity cost (Is it more beneficial to me than the cost?). As Martin mentioned, the “bottom line is that being an effective decision-maker requires practice.”

Gayle Abott, President of Strategic Alignment Partners, a human consulting firm, has implemented a four- point strategy to deploy whenever you must act:

–          Identify the problem.

–          Analyze the possible solutions

–          Evaluate the possibilities that are likely to bring you closer to your goal.

–          Make the decision.

However, as easy as this 4 point system sounds, this type of strategy does not come easily for any beginner. As Abott has said in Business News Daily, it takes years of practice to master this skill. Many people who have become masters did not simply start off as talented decision makers, they made many mistakes in the past, learned from them, and simply moved on. The most crucial part in any decision making in a business, is the ability to learn from them. It is not easy as you think it is because people still make the same mistake, whether it’d be motivated by an emotion, by influence, or by stubbornness. The reality is that, it will not be easy to become a smart business decision maker until you have made enough decisions to consider yourself a smart business decision maker. 

Nevada Corporate Income Tax

A California superior court has issued a temporary and proposed statement of decision holding that a Nevada corporation was entitled to a refund of California corporation franchise taxes paid for the tax years in question because the corporation met its burden of proof in establishing that it was commercially domiciled in Nevada during those years. The corporation, which was incorporated in Nevada, did not rely upon any presumption that its commercial domicile was its place of incorporation. The corporation submitted evidence that it maintained its corporate office in Nevada, its bank accounts were held at a branch in Las Vegas, its brokerage accounts were maintained with an office in Las Vegas, its board of directors’ meetings were held at its office in Nevada, and its original books and records were maintained in Nevada. Also, its only corporate officer resided in Nevada and handled all of its expenditures and business affairs from Nevada. The Franchise Tax Board (FTB) contended that a California resident, the corporation’s sole shareholder and a member of its board of directors, in fact managed and directed the corporation from California, and that therefore the corporation was commercially domiciled in California. However, the FTB submitted no direct evidence to support its contention. Furthermore, both the corporate officer and the sole shareholder testified that decisions on corporate matters were made by the officer and that the shareholder relied on the officer to manage the corporation. The court found the testimony of both witnesses to be credible. In contrast, the FTB’s evidence consisted entirely of circumstantial evidence from which it had asked the court to infer that the sole shareholder was directing or managing the affairs of the corporation from California. The tentative decision will become the final Statement of Decision unless either party requests a Statement of Decision, specifying the principal controverted issues to be addressed, within 10 days.

Corporate Income Tax: Nexus Established Due to Employee’s In-State Activities

The FTB advises a taxpayer that its corporate subsidiary, which had a single employee located in California, was doing business in the state during pre-2011 tax years and therefore was subject to corporation franchise and income taxes during those years because the employee’s transactions were conducted for the purpose of the subsidiary’s financial or pecuniary gain or profit and went beyond the P.L. 86-272 protections. The subsidiary and its parent manufacture and sell various products for consumer and professional use. The subsidiary sold its products to distributors in California, including the parent corporation, which then sold the subsidiary’s products to various retailers throughout California.

Please contact www.sonnycpa.com if you need additional information.

« Previous Page